Kiev Forces Defeated in East Ukraine. Could Obama’s Legacy Be Destroyed by His Ukraine Policy?

ΗΠΑ , Ουκρανία

By Eric Zuesse

The Ukrainian Government that the Obama Administration installed after Obama’s successful coup d’etat in Ukraine is now crashing and burning in the process of the newly installed Government’s ethnic-cleansing program to get rid of the people in Ukraine’s southeast, the area of Ukraine that had voted overwhelmingly for the President whom the Obama Administration (the State Department and the CIA) had overthrown in February.

The residents there rejected this new Government; this new Government is trying to exterminate them; and the local rebel-fighters against that are winning,
and are decimating thousands of troops who were sent in to kill them
and their families, and are shooting down many of the bombers that have
been sent in to bomb them.

The Ukrainian Government prior
to the coup had been economically sustained by borrowing both from
Russia to the east, and also from the EU and U.S. to the west (with a
substantial portion of the U.S. portion of that debt consisting of IMF
loans — the U.S. Government is the major donor to the IMF). These loans
were, ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union, largely being
pocketed by the well-connected former communist nomenklatura or insiders
who had been given formerly state-owned industries during the Harvard-designed privatization program throughout the former U.S.S.R.

These new oligarchs (such as the current Ukrainian President Petro
Poroshenko, who received the Leninska Kuznya shipyard and some
state-owned chocolate factories, as well as a few other companies in
retailing and news-media) got the benefits of those loans and socked
away much of their consequent accumulating wealth in offshore
tax-havens, so that the mounting sovereign debt of Ukraine is already
crushing the Ukrainian population by severe cutbacks in Government
expenditures for social services, road maintenance, and other government
services, while those oligarchs have palatial residences in Western
Europe.
The public, in other words, suffer the debts, while the “oligarchs”
or aristocrats (the former communist insiders) are now
multi-billionaires; and one of them, Ihor Kolomoysky, was assigned a
crucial Governorship, from which post he has largely masterminded and overseen the ethnic-cleansing campaign, which is clearing away the local residents in the land-area of the gas-fields
Furthermore, in order for Ukraine to pay its debts, it is selling off
the assets that had formerly produced income for Ukraine (largely for
Ukraine’s skimming oligarchs) such as selling off the gas pipelines that carry gas from Russia to Europe.
The biggest portion of Ukraine’s income was the transit-fees from these
pipelines, and now these fees will go to investors in Europe and
America, instead of to Ukraine. But Ukraine needs this money desperately
right now, because the EU won’t extend more credit, and the U.S. is already beginning to wake up to its disaster in Ukraine.
So: this costly war will leave behind a failed-state in northwestern
Ukraine, and a separatist southeast, which will likely seek and receive
membership in the Russian Federation. The perhaps more than a million
refugees from Obama’s ethnic-cleansing program in the southeast
will probably return to and rebuild their bombed-out land, and likely
receive a kind of Russian Marshall Plan to assist in that effort.

Looking back, it won’t be any
sort of feather in Obama’s cap, but instead a black mark that will be
comparable to, and perhaps even bigger than, George W. Bush’s
catastrophe in Iraq.

Already, Obama’s economic legacy is economic
stagnation for all but America’s richest 1%, who gained in income 31.4%
while the bottom 99% flatlined a mere 0.4% during the Obama
Administration’s first three years. To call that flatlining for the
bottom 99% an “economic recovery” is to lie, which is what Obama and
professional economists routinely do. And, normally, in an economic
recovery after a crash, the bottom 99% do far better than do the top 1%,
not far worse. This was the direct result of Obama’s continuing Bush’s
policies of a bailout for the banksters, and a failout for the borrowers
and investors. Also, the peddle-to-the metal at the Fed was and is a
huge upward redistribution of wealth. So, President Obama’s liberal
rhetoric on his claimed concern about “equality in America” rings
hollow, if not fraudulent.

A President like this will be
rated at or near the bottom by historians. Perhaps he’s just a less
honest version of George W. Bush, the latter having made no bones about
his conservatism. At least Bush was honest about that. Obama has lied
about the most basic things of all: what he believes, what he actually
cares about, as shown by the decisions that he has made in office. His
policies display him as being like George W. Bush but a better liar from
the standpoint of liberals, who have been taken in by his lies.

The disaster of his Presidency
is now likely to produce electoral losses for the Democratic Party in
November, which result will then be a certain kind of poetic justice for
a Party whose principles are so fraudulent that not even a single
Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives has introduced a
bill of impeachment to remove him from office. That failure is
equivalent to the entire Democratic Party accepting the deep stain on
the Democratic Party’s progressive brand, a stain that means: “We’re all
fakes. Obama’s policies, his actual record, reflect our conservative
values. He’s not a Republican-in-verbal-disguise. He really is one of us, even after his having been the first U.S. President to place outright nazis into control of a foreign government.”

The only thing that can
significantly reduce the mounting cynicism in this country is for a
House Democrat to introduce a bill of impeachment against perhaps the
worst President in American history. It would be to say: “He’s not
really a Democrat, at heart; he’s just a very effective liar.” If
Democrats want to retain control of the Senate, they’ll need to disown
and remove this stain upon it. For the 2014 elections, and the 2016
Presidential election, this will signal the end of the corrupt
Clinton-Obama “Democratic” Party, and the rebirth of the FDR Democratic
Party, a Party that truly was progressive and anti-fascist.

It would end the Clinton-Obama
one-Party, conservative-Party, corporate-Party, U.S. political system.
But without that change, the U.S. has no realistic hope. If Obama
continues to be accepted as a Democrat, then the final two years of his
Presidency will be spent signing into law numerous far-right bills that
have passed both houses of Congress — a Republican House and a
Republican Senate. He’ll have a field day signing so many fascist bills
into law. It will be the most conservative Government in American
history. The Democratic Party will be dead. And democracy in America
will be just a nostalgic memory for Americans who are old enough to
remember what it was like. What it was like was progress for and in
America. What we will have ever afterwards is dictatorship for and in
America. The choice is up to each and every current Democratic member of
the U.S. House of Representatives.

Even before the Ukrainian junta-Government’s collapsing, Americans
are more favorable toward impeachment of Barack Obama than they ever
were toward impeachment of Bill Clinton, or even of George W. Bush – and no House Democrat even introduced a bill to impeach even him.
(Does the Democratic Party not stand for anything at all?) The demand
for Obama’s impeachment will only grow, if there turn out to be two
Republican-controlled Houses of Congress – and, then, the bill to
impeach will inevitably be a Republican one, with Republican (not
Democratic) reasons. The only opportunity for the Democratic Party to
restore itself and America, will have been missed.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

GLOBAL RESEARCH