Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing Thorner Str. 7
42283 Wuppertal (Germany) +49 / 202 / 2502621

human rights acitivist
to the International Crime Court
to be delivered to the Chief Prosecutor Mrs. Fatou Bensouda

Maanstraat 174

2516 AB, The Hague (Netherlands)

subject: -Greek charge regarding art. 7 Roman Statute
reference: -further crucial evidence especially regarding the objective part

Dear Madam, Mrs. Chief Prosecutor,

21.11.2012 (edited)

I address myself as a German citizen to
you in the awareness, that the German people confesses itself to
inalienable und invulnerable (universal) human rights as the basis of
every human community, of peace, and of justice in the world (according
to art. 1 par. 2 Basic Law, which is protected by the eternity guarantee
of art. 79 par. 3 Basic Law). In his famous speech at the 06.09.1946
the then US foreign minister Mr. Byrnes has demanded, that Germany had
to bind itself to human rights and to peace as a precondition, which
would allow the USA, to accept that Germany might get to wealth again.
In the Parlamentarian Council, the body, which has worked out and
concluded the German Basic Law, Dr. Seebohm (German Party) demanded in
his plenary speech at the 08.05.1949 a legally binding obligation of
Germany to human rights and to peace, in order to enable other states to
trust Germany again („Der Parlamentarische Rat“, Band 9, Harald-Boldt
publishing house, p.562). This means the legal obligation to the
universal human rights, for the wording of art. 1 par. 2 Basic Law has
been developed starting from a draft of the first paragraph of the
preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Right (UDHR), and the
other international human rights systems, which are valid today in
Germany, have been come into existence after the the Basic Law (1949)
(European Human Rights Convention of the Council of Europe concluded in
1950, and the EU Basic Rights Charter concluded in 2000 and made legally
binding in 2009).
Dr. Süsterhenn (Christian-Democratical
Union) demanded in his plenary speech in the Parlamentarian Council at
the 08.09.1948 („Der Parlamentarische Rat“, Band 9, Harald-Boldt
publishing house, p.56), that the universal human rights, if they are
valid for UN trustee areas, then even more must be valid for the
occupied Germany. Also the German Constitutional Court has confirmed
art. 1 par. 2 Basic Law as a connection to the universal human rights
(no. 96 of the Bodenreform III judgement, BVerfGE 112,1). In addition to
that, the Constitutional Court has in no. 225 of the Lisbon judgement
at the 30.06.2009 recognized the peace principle (obligation to peace by
art. 1 par. 2 Basic Law, not to be misunderchanged with the prohibition
of aggressive war by art. 26 Basic Law).

This means for me as a German citizen
(official confirmation, that I am a German citizen, is attached), as a
part of the sovereign (the people), to stand protecting the universal
human rights.

The Greek journalists Georgios Tragkas,
Panagiotis Tzenos, and Antonios Prekas, and the Greek politician
Dimitrios Konstantaras (Nea Democratica), have filed a charge regarding
the suspicion of crimes against humanity (art. 7 Roman Statute). The
charge regarding art. 7 Roman Statute is directed against Christine
Lagarde (CEO of the IMF), Herman van Rompuy (President of the European
Council), Jose Manuel Barroso (President of the EU Commission), the
German Federal Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel, and the German Federal
Minister of Finance, Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble.

You find the English text of the charge at the following link:
www.scribd.com/doc/protected/100418463

At Romania, not only the reduction of
the pensions by 15% has been demanded and been rushed through by
government and parliament, but also moderating fees for the ambulant
medical supply, even though at Romania already before the IMF
(respectively the Troika) for stays at the hospital everything from
medicaments to material has had to be paid by the patients themselves,
and the health insurance has paid nearly only the work of the doctor,
and even though the hygiene at the hospital is so bad, that many
patients are infected there with tuberculosis. Now even the amubulant
health care shall be taken away from the poor. 150 to 200 of the 435
Romanian hospitals are going to be closed and the rest to be transferred
to the Romanian municipalities, most of them also are close to
bankruptcy. Between 9.300 and 10.000 beds are going to be reduced in
those hospitals, which are not directly going to be closed.
The mentioned numbers are from the year 2010, as the follwing links prove:
www.wsws.org/de/2010/jun2010/ruma-j09-shtml
www.wsws.org/de/2010/apr2010/ruma-a5.shtml
www.wsws.ord/de/2010/jun2010/ruma-j18.shtml
Also the taz confirms, that there have
been since 2010, and still are, drastical cuts in the Romanian health
system because of the conditions of the Troika. According to the article
„Gott sei Dank nicht mehr in die Klinik“ of the 17.01.2012, the „health
supply in the poorest EU country“ is collapsing „piece for piece“. The
health expenditures are with 3,5% to 4% of the GDP only at the half of
the EU average. 40.000 doctors are missing in the country, tenthousands
of doctors and male nurses have emigrated. In some rural regions there
is „scarcely health supply, in some small towns only very limited.“
According to the article, an orderly medical treatment is only available with bribery. The sufferers are poor and old people.
Because of the austerity measures, among
them, besides drastical cuts in the health system, also cuts of the
wages in the public sector by 25% and of the pensions and of many social
benefits by between 15% and 25%, meanwhile already 3 million Romanians
have emigrated, most of them to Italy, Spain, and Germany.
www.taz.de/!85782/

Romania’s health sector has already been severely damaged by the IMF in the 1990ies (part V.2 of this letter).
IV. proof of the systematical nature of the attack by means of the „little treaty change“ (art. 136 par. 3 TFEU)
IV.1 safeguarding the financial sector as the real cause of the excessive strictness
The pain caused by the excessive
conditions at the cost of the Greeks, has not primarily to do with the
Greeks. The liquidity problems of the country have only been used as an
opportunity, in order to be able to establish more and more mechanisms
for the securing of the financial sector. This is the real suspected
motive of the crime.
The Greeks have been chosen as only the
first victims. The Germans like all inhabitants of the eurozone are
going to be treated later, namely of the enactment of art. 136 par. 3
TFEU.

A new art. 136 par. 3 TFEU is going to be inserted into the EU primary law, whose wording is as follows:
„The Member States whose currency is the
euro, may establish a stability mechanism to be activated if
indispensable to safeguard the stability of the euro area as a whole.
The granting of any required financial assistance under the mechanism
will be made subject under strict conditionality.“
Links: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/118578.pdf 

conclusions of the economic and finance
ministers (Ecofin) in the Council of Ministers of the 10.05.2010 (file
number SN 2564/1/10)
http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/__Anlagen/2010/20100510beschluesseeurolaenderfinanzministe
r,property=publicationFile.pdf
recommendations of the „task force“ of the 21.10.2010
www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/117326.pdf
The ESM, in addition to that, is obliged by art. 3 ESM Treaty, to make „strict“ conditions.
www.eurozone.europa.eu/media/582866/02-tesm2/de12.pdf
The economic government is obliged by
consideration no. 3 in connection with art. 6 of EU regulation 2011/385
(COD), to impose „strict „ conditoins (see also part IV.3 of this
letter) http://ec.europa.eu/europa2020/pdf/proposal_strength_eco_en.pdf
In addition to that, all conditions
within the EFSF are, according to the preamble of the EFSF Framework
Treaty, planned as strict as they are towards Greece:
see EFSF Framework Treaty of the 07.06.2010
http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/nn_1270/DE/Wirtschaft__und__Verwaltung/Europa/20100609-
Schutzschirm-Euro-Anlage__1,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf
in 2011 concluded modified EFSF Framework Treaty (draft of the 26.08.2011)
http://www.nachdenkseiten.de/upload/pdf/110902_EFSF_Rahmenvertrag_Anpassung.pdf
The „practice“ of the IMF is something
completely different than the content of the statute of the IMF. In the
statute of the IMF, there is no obligation to inhumanity at all. By
means of an excessive immunity against penalty law and against liability
as well as by means of excessive payment, however, the standards of
moral and of viewing the world are, within the IMF, in a way shifted,
resulting in IMF conditions without any respect to basic rights and to
human rights of the inhabitants of the debtor countries.
The Roman Statute is the basis solely
for the prosecution of crimes, which have been committed at the
01.07.2002 or later, like the suspected crime against humanity against
the Greek people. For crimes before that date, a prosecution is not
possible by the ICC, but possibly by international ad hoc – courts like
those for Ruanda and Jugoslavia or by national courts of the respective
victim state.
In view of the systematical obligation of
the conditions to a strictness as in the „practice“ of the IMF, which
would be valid with the enactment of art. 136 par. 3 TFEU, it is however
crucial for the interpretation, what a strictness according to the
„practice“ of the IMF means, to look also at older conditions – for the
proof, that an obligation to the strictness as in the „practice“ of the
IMF implies, to intervene, for the securing of the financial sector, so
deep into the human rights to health (art. 12 UN Social Pact) and to
food (art. 11 UN Social Pact), that this reaches systematically up to
art. 7 par. 1 lit. k Roman Statute.

The initiation of an investigation by
the ICC is necessary also in order to set a crucial sign just in time,
in order to prevent the systematic inhumanity from being entrenched with
the rank of EU primary law by means of art. 136 par. 3 s. 2 TFEU,
because this would put this strictness, from the perspective of the EU,
over any law of the United Nations !

At Vietnam, farmers have been encouraged
by the World Bank, to cultivate for export instead of food for the own
population (p. 177 Chossudovsky). Because of the decline of the world
market prices for the respective export commodities, Vietnam got into
the situation, to subvention food exports, while the farmers of the
country were starving as a result of the IMF typical curency devaluation
including the increase of the prices for fuel and fertilizer connected
to it. In 1994, a famine has taken place with 50.000 affected people,
while in the same year, because of the collapse of public rice trade
companies, two million tons of Vietnamese rice remained unsold (p. 178).
In the years 1987 to 1990, 25% of the adults and 50% of the children at
Vietnam were undernourished (p. 179). The enforced orientation to
export has also led to the expulsion of family farmers by big landowners
(p. 182).
The film „Raubzug des IWF in
Argentinien“ of Kanal B of the year 2002 shows clearly the behaviour of
the IMF at Argentina. The country has, until the beginning of the
military dictatorship in the 1970ies, been one of the countries with the
highest standard of living at Latin America and with a broad middle
class. Argentina has received its first IMF loan already one week after
the assumption of the military dictatorship in 1976. At the end of the
dictatorship, the country had 30,- billon $ debts, half of which have
been publid bailouts of private debts. From 1983 to 1989 always more
public expenditures, because of the pressure by the IMF, have been
reduced, from 1989 to 1992 all public enterprizes have been privatized.
Since the Menem government, the cuts also in the social area became so
strong, that the starvation begun, years after the end of the dictator-
ship. According to the journalist Sebastian Hacher (Indymedia), in the
year 2002 at Argentina, 100 children per day died of starvation; this
means 36.500,- children died of starvation per year at that time at
Argentina, a high number especially in comparison to a total number of
30.000,- people during murdered by the Argentinian military
dictatorship. And the adult Argentinians, who have died of starvation
because of the IMF, are not counted yet in this number. At demonstrator
at the demonstration of the jobless people at the 11.03.2002 estimated
the number of starving people at that time alone for the area Buenos
Aires to circa 4,- million people.
In order to keep the control at Brazil
even though the mass layoffs in the public sector and the removal of the
public pension insurance in 1994 after the constitutional change, which
had been enforced by the IMF for these purposes (p. 195 ff. „The
Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order“, Prof. Dr. Michel
Chossudovsky), a part of the reduction of the expenditures has been used
for food aid to the inhabitants of slums. In rural areas, there are, in
addition to that, model projects, where landless people are gives
exhausted agricultural areas (or can buy them with the help of World
Bank loans), which seem not profitable enough for the big landowners.
And the areas are given to the landless people, which are not in the
land register, but are the property of Indigenous people, whereas in
1994 the constitutionally guaranteed property rights of the Indigenous
people had been streaked according to the command of the IMF. Instead of
paying for food for all, the IMF let it happen, that instead the state
paid to big landowners for the employment of land workers, and that food
aid supplies were also used for the targeted destructed of the food
cultivation of family farmers (p. 195 and 201-202, „The Globalization of
Poverty and the New World Order“, Prof. Dr. Michel Chossudovsky).
The Brazilian “Fome Zero” (null hunger)
program of President Lula da Silva, which wanted to free a seven digit
number of Brazilians from starvation, but which has been realized in an
only significantly reduced form, because the IMF has not granted a debt
moratorium, which had been requested for the benefit of Brazil
(Germanwatch interview with Prof. Dr. Jean Ziegler of the year 2005).
www.germanwatch.org/zeitung/2005-4-ziegler.htm
At Peru, 83% of the inhabitants are
undernourished because of the conditions (p. 31, „The Globalization of
Poverty and the New World Order“, Prof. Dr. Michel Chossudovsky). The
country has been exposed several times to shocking IMF conditions. From
1980 – 1983, the undernourishment of children has risen dramati- cally,
and from 1975 to 1985, the food consumption of the total population has
shrinked by 25% (p. 209). The decline of the real wages from 1980 to
1985 has been at 45% (p. 209). Even significantly more drastically
directed against the food supply have been the IMF conditions at August
1990, when the rapid combination of artifical currency devalution,
limitation of the wages, and letting loose of the prices, resulted in
the increase of the prices, in comparison to the wages, within one
month, for fuel to the 31-fold, for bread to the 12-fold, and for food
in the average by 446 %. The IMF enforced, in the name of the fight
against the hyperinflation of August 1990, layoffs in the public sector,
cuts social in the social system, and the reduction of wages (p.216).
Since the hyperinflation with all its effects like the increase in price
of fertilizer etc., has not been enough for the destruction of the
family farming at Peru, the IMF simply enforced its prohibiton by means
of a legal minimum size for a farm of at least 10 ha; and only with at
least this minimum size, agri- cultural loans have been available (p.
221).

At Bolivia, the trade liberalization,
enforced by IMF, together with aid shipments, served for a decline of
the production costs between 1985 and 1988 by 25,9 % (p. 232, „The
Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order“, Prof. Dr. Michel
Chossudovsky).
At Russia, the combination of artifical
currency devaluation and of releasing the prices, both imposed by the
IMF, served at 1992 for to a hundredfold increase of the prices, while,
in the name of the fight against inflation, only a tenfold increase of
the wages has been tolerated. The price of bread has risen
operproportio- nally from between 17 and 18 kopeks to 20 rubles (p. 240,
„The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order“, Prof. Dr.
Michel Chossudovsky). The food supply sank below the level it had during
World War II (p. 241). In 1993, the IMF, in addition to that, effected
by the deregulation of a big Russian bread fabric, a further between
tripling and quadrupling of the bread price (p. 249).
The family farmer food cultivation at
Albania has been pushed back by a combination of trade liberalization,
of food aid from subventioned grain surpluses, from currency devaluation
(resulting in price increase of fertilizer and fuel, shrinking of the
real wages etc.), and the destruction of the domestic seeds production
(in order to make dependened on more expensive seeds).
(„The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order“, Prof. Dr. Michel Chossudovsky)
That these IMF conditions at the cost of
the starving cannot be rare single cases, is shown by the official
report of the 07.02.2001 (file number E/CN.4/2001/53) by Prof. Dr. Jean
Ziegler, the then UN Special Rapporteur for the human right to food,
according to which (see no.. 69c of the report) the credit conditions of
IMF and World Bank are world-wide the second-biggest cause for the
starvation in the world, even more than biotechnology in agriculture and
than wars.
www.righttofood.org/new/PDF/ECN4200153.pdf
In 1990, world-wide 822 million people,
in 2007 ca. 923 million people, and in 2008 ca. 963 million people have
starved. At the 19.06.2009, already about a billion people were
starving. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welthunger
www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/8836/icode/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8109698.stm
At 2004, enough food has been produced
for 12 billion people (interview with Prof. Jean Ziegler in the edition
4/2005 of the Germanwatch newspaper). According to the then actual world
food report, neverthe- less, in 2004, more than 100.000 people per day
were starving of starvation or of the immediate effects of starvation;
in the average of the year 2004, each 5 seconds a child below the age of
10 died of starvation. www.germanwatch.org/zeitung/2005-4-ziegler.htm
V.2 IMF conditions one of the main reasons for the rise of tuberculosis und further diseases
According to an article of Dr. F. William
Engdahl, who is a member of the globalization research network „Global
Research“, of the 27.11.2009, are among the most recent IMF conditions
towards the Ukraine drastical cuts in the health sector, among them the
closure of hospitals and layoffs in the health sector. The behaviour of
the IMF towards the Ukraine is a proof, that the IMF even after the
start of the economic crisis still acts in the same way, hostile against
human rights. The Ukraine has been affected particularly hard by the
economic crisis, by a speculative bubble and by a deep recession.

In this context, Dr. Engdahl reports on a
study of the Cambridge University of the year 2008, which has
statistically proven by 21 middle and eastern European countries, that
states, which have been under IMF conditions, have had a significantly
higher tuberculosis rate than states without IMF conditions.

The publication date 22.07.2008 of the study shows, that it has depicted a time before the current economic crisis.

At South Korea, the issuing bank has
been restructured under direct control by IMF and Wall Street banks (p.
328, „The Globaliziation of Poverty and the New World Order“, Prof. Dr.
Michel Chossudovsky“).
VI. further considerations regarding the subjective part
VI.1 mögliche Spuren anhand der Entstehungsgeschichte des Art. 136 Abs. 3 AEUV
The history of the creating of art. 136
par. 3 TFEU is of crucial relevance not only objectively for the proof
of the systematical nature and of the large scope, but also for the
subjective part for the investigation of the question, which persons are
responsible for the attempt to orientate the EU law and the states of
the eurozone to such an extent to the safeguarding of banks, while
pretendingly referring to an alleged „safeguarding of the euro“, and to
even obligate that to a strictness according to the „practice“ of the
IMF.
The „Eurogroup“ is a body, in which the
economic and financial ministers of those EU member states, whose
currency is the euro, can discuss confidentially with exclusion of the
public questions, on which they decide later in the EU Council of
Ministers. Sometimes, the results of the „Eurogroup“ are published, as
it has been after the session of the 28.11.2010. According to the
explanation of the „Eurogroup“ of the 28.11.2010, Herman van Rompuy
(President of the European Council) should present the draft of art. 136
par. 3 TFEU at the following summit of the European Council (EU body of
the Prime Ministers of the EU member states). As a result, the Prime
Ministers concluded at the summit of the European Council at the
16./17.12.2010, to initiate art. 136 par. 3 TFEU. It seems, that Herman
van Rompuy has earlier and better informed than most or even than all of
the Prime Ministers and financial ministers of the countries of the
eurozone, who has drafted art. 136 par. 3 TFEU for which objectives.
link to the declaration of the Eurogroup of the 28.11.2010
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ecofin/118051.pdf
link to the conclusions of the summit 16./17.12.2010 of the European Council and draft + considerations of art. 136 par. 3 TFEU
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/118578.pdf

EU regional commissioner Johannes Hahn
had commissioned the Austrian economic research institute WIFO with a
study, which has been published by the WIFO institute in May 2010 under
the name „Funktionsfähigkeit und Stabilität des Euro-Raumes“.
http://karl.aiginger.wifo.ac.at/fileadmin/files_aiginger/publications/2010/eurostabilitaet.pdf
The study says on art. 136 par. 3 TFEU
(these sentences authorized translated from German into English by the
husband of Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing):
„So the Commission is working on proposals
for the gradual realization of a kind of ‘economic government’, by which
the economic policy of the community can be better coordinated. The
basis for this will deliver the new prescriptions of art. 136 TFEU.
There, measures are planned for the members of the eurozone, in order to
‘strengthen the coordination and the surveillance of their budgetary
discipline’. This shall allow crisis interventions, but they should be
as unattractive as possible.“

The WIFO expert opinion proves, that
art. 136 par. 3 TFEU has already been discussed before May 2010 as the
legal basis in EU primary law for the European financing mechanism
(Greece support, EFSM, EFSF, and ESM) and for the enabling of the EU
Commission as the EU economic government (via tightened Stability and
Growth Pact, Imbalance Procedure, and Budgetary Surveillance), and that
there even had already been at that time concrete deliberations
regarding the wording for art. 136 par. 3 TFEU. The same WIFO expert
opinion also includes the proposals, most of which have been used by the
EU Commission for the drafts in September 2010 of the EU regulations
for the tightening of the Stability and Growth Pact and for the intro-
duction of the Imbalance Procedure.

And even though all this Goldman Sachs
is counselling „the European governments and the EU regarding the
management of the debt crisis“, thus seems to play an even more central
role in orchestrating the bank safeguarding in the name of the
safeguarding of the euro than the Deutsche Bank.
www.deutsche-mittelstands-nachrichten.de/2011/11/11670
The importance of the control over the
ECB and over the Italian government is also shown in the article
„Goldman: ‘Neuwahlen in Italien sind das Schlimmste!’ “ of the Deutsche
Mittelstandsnachrichten of the 09.11.2011. According to the article,
Goldman Sachs has lobbyied for a technocrat government and for new
elections not before January, better spring 2012 – successful, meanwhile
His Excellency, Mr. Mario Monti, governs Italiy. And Goldman Sachs
really ask the ECB to to carry on buying in big style Italian bonds; a
crucial piece of evidence, that Goldman Sachs also seems to be involved
in bets regarding an Italian state bankruptcy.
www.deutsche-mittelstandsnachrichten.de/2011/11/31177
As the article „Goldman Sachs empfiehlt
Wetten gegen Europa“ of the Deutsche Mittelstandsnachrichten of the
15.11.2011 shows, this bank meanwhile offers credit default swaps, with
which one can speculate against banks and insurance companies, at whom
risks of the loss of credit claims are assumed. In addition to that,
Goldman Sachs strategist Alan Brazil recommends to speculate against the
euro, because the euro is signifi- cantly weakened, if further rescue
packages are made. The article also says, that Goldman Sachs counsels
„many European governments“ regarding the debt crisis. Just in the weak
before the 15.11.2011, Goldman Sachs has, at a meeting with the Spanish
economic minister Jose Manuel Campa and with creditor banks, presented
concrete „proposals“ „for further austerity measures at Spain“. This
shows at the same time the elevated power position in comparison to
other creditor banks.
www.deutsche-mittelstands-nachrichten.de/2011/09/24129/
That the Italian Prime Minister, His
Excellency, Mario Monti, means, that particularly Goldman Sachs governs
Italy, is also shown by the article „Italien – die Monti-Euphorie ist
bereits vorbei“ of Alles Schall und Rauch of the 17.11.2011. According
to the article, already thousands of Italians are protesting against the
„government of the banker“ and shout sentences like „We do not want a
government of the banks“ or „Monti makes beggars of us all.“ Alles
Schall und Rauch prognosticates that, His Ecellency, Mr. Monti does not
only want to „fulfill the promises to the EU and drastical austerity
measures, but also to rigorously push forward the privatization, and to
drastically restrict the use of cash in the every day payments
transactions. What the Greeks already experience, now will approach the
Italians, wages down, taxes up, with the impoverishment of the society,
resulting from that.“
http://alles-schallundrauch.blogspot.com/2011/11/italien-die-monti-euphorie-ist-bereits.html#ixzz1e0APyoln
Goldman Sachs also earns as
„Betreuerbank“ of the EFSF, while the EFSF does not say, how much these
„Betreuerbanken“ finally earn at the cost of the tax payers for their
service to the EFSF (article „Wie Goldman Sachs am EFSF mitverdient“ of
the Deutsche Mittelstandsnachrichten vom 06.10.2011)
www.deutsche-mittelstands-nachrichten.de/2011/710/27148/
Meanwhile, Dr. Jörg Asmussen is a counsellor of the SPD chancellor candidate Peer Steinbrück
http://jasminrevolution.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/ifd-leak-die-steinbruck-goldman-connection
The actual decisive influence of Goldman
Sachs on the ECB and on the Italian government, and for a long time, on
the German government, as well as the significant influence of Goldman
Sachs in the steering committee of the Bilderberg network, combined with
significant own interests as a creditor of states and especially as a
tenderer of CDS, make urgently necessary an investigation, if and, if
yes, in how far this bank has influenced the behaviour of Germany, of
Italy, and particularly of the ECB regarding the conditions on Greece
and regarding the creation of the European financing mechanism.
At least the gentlemen Mario Draghi, (His Excellency) Mario Monti, and Dr. Jörg Asmussen should be interviewed on this.